Відео

This was recommended as I just got the desktop version the other day. Thank you for your work on this and making it available. Stay safe.

what software are u using? i looked for one and it was bogus

believe it or not... still not fixed till today :(

Fabulous demo! I’ll. be applying this way of working to My pro 3 sequencing. Thank you! 🖖

Detuning voices is done intentionally for sound. The other per-voice differences probably reflect units that need service. However this is an excellent marketing opportunity and I'm not surprised Behringer makes a mockery of a misinterpretation.

So, at present, no...scrap that. Sounds to me like the thing BEH should do in firmware Update is simply SCRAP the Atrophy implementation and replace it altogether. The bottom line of Atrophy is that it would be best to pick one Profile, run with that and NEVER TOUCH IT, ever again. This would keep all your patches from being raped on a routine basis. As is, you would need to keep a log: My preset U-24 uses Atrophy Profile #3. So, when I decide to play with U-25, which uses AT Profile 7, I need to remember to change AT Profile back to #3 after I've engaged preset U-24...for 24 to sound as I intended. Either that or ONLY EVER use AT PROFILE #3. Maybe there would be a few happy accidents... I wonder if a companion software could account for or FIX the matter: You save a U (user) patch, using AT Profile #1 and the companion softer immediately saves it paired with every possible AT Profile. I can't recall how many you said there are. 8? So, you make one patch and you get 7 more variations of it. By then, you likely can't remember what it was you were going to record...

Thank you for this!

i would just like to say out loud how utterly awesome this is. And I am indeed going to buy this man's 'Mass and Motion' sound-set based on this.

In about 1969 or 70 I heard One is the loneliest number done on the moog it was one of the first. On the radio in Sacramento California my dad was a musician I ran into the living room to tell him about this new electronic electronical thing that could play music have you ever heard of the mood synthesizer dad no he hadn't well I had to tell him it's new it's all electronic. I loved those first old songs. I actually taped it off the radio but I'd like to know what album it was off of I bet there's more songs on the album I would like to hear.

My friend, you are clearly a genius!

Damn... I used to Sequence multiple synths a lot on the X years ago. I took a break off it for sometime. I forget now what firmware I was on.... I didn't update for years but this year I updated and now that I see this I'm wondering if I shouldn't have. There's not really anything I wanted in the Newer Updates. I was fine with how it was before, but just wanted the midi to be tighter/better, and also more sample capabilities. Maybe like an actually decent Reverb or something. I won't pay for non of there plug-ins or whatever... I just use this thing as a Sequencer/Sampler and that's more or less it. Have they made any progress with this or just done the Akai thing and continued to ignore? They probably too busy designing more plug-ins we all don't really need/want.

Just bought the 15 Ep patch set, thank you so much and what a deal at 10 bucks. You really saved me, I was struggeling to get a decent Ep sound, gave up and was thinking I needed to get another board like a MODX for basic pianos. Love the sounds love them love them love them, thank you thank you thank you. Rich

Just now coming across this video when looking for some info on my Rev2 but after recently acquiring and subsequently restoring and calibrating a Jupiter 4 this makes so much sense. Especially when you go into the resonances and how the calibration on the Jupiter was almost a spot on representation doing each voice card. I think a light bulb clicked on after seeing this and what you are doing. Going to have to go and try some of this soon. Great explanation and information!

I had to sub mate, as I really enjoyed this tutorial! I got mine June last year and have hardly done anything with it if I'm honest. I like to be able to follow a tutorial on how to do real interesting stuff like this by myself, as opposed to buying 'ready made patches' in which you don't learn much at all. I've a Wavestate & a PA600, but none of these would've been possible had a boy racer not wrecked my car 2 years ago. So I walk to work instead and bought these keyboards.

Thanks for going into this! Great info.

Is this per voice variance in older synths a symptom of component degradation?

Hey man, will there ever be a Volume 3 :)? Your patches are sublime man. The more closely i listen to each individual patch, the more impressed i am. As if there is alot of vintage character hidden if you listen closely. Anyway, i obviously subbed, like 2 weeks ago now i think.

Seen many videos of people playing this cool synth, but very few of them add any drums. Thanks for confirming that it's also awesome with drums!

You must be smitten. That update is exactly what you've been trying to build on sequentials for years, ha!

Lovely video! Helped me alot! Thanks man <3

This video was very educational. Thank you very much!

Easy on the vibrato.

At 5:30 regarding UBX: it will have discrete VCOs and the true 2-pole OTA-based SEM filters. There will be additional 4-pole filter modes as well, but those will use a different circuit. Note: in the UBX there will be no CEM chips of any kind, even though a vintage OB-X used CEM3310 EGs. Not even the OB-X8 does this anymore as software transient generators have long since taken over.

Awesome.. and so flexible. Any regrets getting the standard edition over the SE?

Really cool and glad I found your channel! I'm waiting for my Pro-3. Hopefully the end of the week so trying to get ahead.

Youre a legend for coming up with the modern "vintage mode" techniques! What are your thoughts on the TEO-5? Personally i preordered immediately and dropped the thought of rebuying an ob6 or saving up for an x8 as i only really care about the SEM filter + the modulation options and oscillators sound crazy

Thank you for making this downloadable!

Great video and I'm in awe of your great reactive lighting and robotic set up... really cool indeed! 👌🙏💅

Awesome video. Can the modeling be put as a setting that is there anytime we want to create a patch from scratch? Thanks! I’m in the market for a polysynth and this might be my choice.

Is it possible to change OSC1 frequency by semitones, or is it stuck to changing only using octaves ?

So its a bit of a lemon. From all the videos I have seen the filter at full resonance doesn't sound like the classic SEM. Is that just because of the sound designer or the actual hardware?

Best demo of practical application of the sequencer. ❤

I already loved my Rev 2 but I'm realizing there's a lot more to love. Thank you so much for sharing the benefits of all your hard work, what a service! This might be a dumb question, I've only had the synth a few months, but is the voice modeling possible without the editor? I ask because I have the Rev 2 in a separate room from the work station as a simple "turn it on and get creative" instrument. Many thanks and one new sub.

❤

A well researched factual video, thanks for that. The good news in this context is that third-party manufacturers can now sell patch sheets on which the Atrophy settings matching the patch created can be noted. The last sentence was, of course, not meant entirely seriously. 😉

It seems you are saying that if I build a patch using Atrophy #1 and save it, then switch the machine to a different atrophy, then revert back to Atrophy 1 that your patch will then sound different and need to be tweaked again? I will have to test mine... Is that your claim? Thanks much for your insights into these attributes.

I traded my excellent condition 40 year OB8 for the Oberheim/Sequential OB-X8. I was worried that it might need a trip to the shop soon. Then, I sold the OB-X8, pocketed a few grand, and then got this Behringer. Out of the box, the Behringer patches need a lot of work/tweaks to sound as good as the previous two I mentioned. I probably should have kept the OB-X8, as it if VERY fat and has a little more sizzle. However, some of the demos assure me I can tweak the Behr to sound like I want it to....

Wow … Remind me why I’m bothering with hardware synths, again … ?! 😬 Where’s this method going to be in 5 years? Or even just 2?

Jason, to your knowledge, have any if these recommendations been acted upon by Sequential? Have you ever heard from anyone at Sequential about your VCM research? They must have seen it discussed/referenced on the Sequential forum, if nowhere else! Cheers! PS - I assume these recommendations would apply equally to the ‘vintage algorithms’ in the OB6, Tri6, P5/10 & the OBX8, as well - do you know?! Perhaps your recommendations here have in fact been implemented in one or more of these (either upon release, for the later-released units, or via later updates?!).

You, Sir, are my synth programming hero.

😎

any thoughts on the pitch bender? I've never used this style so I'm not sure how it compares to a wheel or a roland style joystick for lead/solo lines

Hi, I bought the sound pack last year, I've upgraded my Macbook and can't find my original order to download the patches again... how do I get access?

Awesome video. Just had to click the time bar like 50 times to see you actually play a note.

can these sounds be used in a moog subsequent 37?

Can i maybe ask you a few questions as a beginner hardware synth user about how to connect your solar 42 to lets say a mpc one and getting them synced ?

Any plans on doing a bank for sale?

My guess is there's round robining at work. Meaning not all voices have the same fixed offsets, and order of voices changes. I.e. not always 1-2-3-4-5-etc. This worked with another multitimbral synth, set Mono, 1 vioce per MIDI channel. (Not the monster sound of 3rd wave, unfortunately, though a bigger sound neverthelesss.)

Sounds good did you sync to tr8 via gate out tr8 , 1/8 cable to gate in on the 42, ? It sounds locked pretty well any issues with sync ?